Jump to Navigation

Notes from the Creating a common repository of documents workshop

--- The Outcome of the Workshop ---

We decided to put together a metadocumentation that links to various documentations and adds what is necessary. We adopted the Video page on Wikibooks (it was an abandoned stub). We believe a wiki would be the ideal technical solution for compiling an overview of different docs that are already available. Also in terms of ownership a Wikipedia project is ideal.

Therefore, we start this project now:
http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Video

--- Intitial Doodles ---

There are many documents that would could collaborate on.

Here are some categories. We can cut and paste URL's of existing documentation here.

++Software guides: What software does what job, what are the pros and cons of these applications

++Perscriptive Idiot Guides for Encoding and Applications

++Video Handbooks, Video Making Documents, Overview guides to Video online / distribution

++Indepth Documentation for Geeks, building media servers, installing CMS's, transcoding, command line encoding etc.

--- Edited transcript of the chat ---

http://www.flossmanuals.net

trying to address the duplication of documentation

keeping things up to date

communicating back with developers

http://video.indymedia.org

too specific to be shared ... targetting of the documentation to users

and different types of audiences

http://www.flossmanuals.net

translation and languages is an issue

difficult to manage as there are many platforms

compare with images for example (photoshop, gimp)

topic seems to be too general, a lot of people do encoding for different platforms, so hard to write documentation. inherent problem with writing documentation for video making, too general a topic as oppsed to writing for image maniplation where everyone has photoshop

2 approaches
one is per-package, one is "generic"

per-package may be 50 different help files

Also, the potential expected results are varied as well (not only JPG/GIF/PNG, but too many options formats codecs).

but we can't really define a "standard"

an overview is relatively easier to produce

and then enable drill-down to specifics

http://www.current.tv/

need people as committed to writing documentation as other people are committed to writing software

documentation should be part of the software release

documentation should be written by non-developers for users

video blog? step by step guide to uploading video etc, including video documentation

http://freevlog.org?

screencasting, allows yoou to record and narrate everything that you do on screen
really effective way of documentation, need to look up software for that

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Screencast

vnc remote desktop software

Screencasting is an effective way to do documentation. Program
Snap X Pro (Mac OS X)

http://freevlog.org/ confirmed

http://www.streamingmanuals.net

camtasia player

http://freevlog.org/tutorial/#

it is to record your screen on windoiws

vnc2swf for multiplatform screencasting

about the screen capturing, also there is http://www.unixuser.org/~euske/vnc2swf/

http://del.icio.us/avngoinabox/tutorials

http://audiovideo.ngoinabox.org

http://www.transmission.cc/wiki/Notes_from_the_Creating_a_common_reposit...

we need to analyse where the gaps are

indepth docs for geeks means the server guys who run the boxes but dont know anything about video

but we should focus on the idiots guides

http://video.indymedia.org/en/

http://ourvideo.org

http://clearerchannel.org

http://www.videohelp.com (for beginner to advanced)

http://www.streamingsuitcase.com/

http://www.doom9.com (non-beginner)

http://www.streamingmedia.com

http://drupal.org/videocasts/

http://docs.indymedia.org (good 'portal')

but there is still no good place to disemminate all the existing documentation

we shouldn't create a new thing

but creating a 'gateway' is just as hard

we could use the same format as floss

http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Main_Page

http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Video

http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Video#Internet_Video

something usable has been started there..

can make print on demand books from the mute technology

wikibooks not being looked after closely so could easily be taken over

people seem happy with this idea
let's do it.