Notes from the Creating a common repository of documents workshop
--- The Outcome of the Workshop ---
We decided to put together a metadocumentation that links to various documentations and adds what is necessary. We adopted the Video page on Wikibooks (it was an abandoned stub). We believe a wiki would be the ideal technical solution for compiling an overview of different docs that are already available. Also in terms of ownership a Wikipedia project is ideal.
Therefore, we start this project now:
http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Video
--- Intitial Doodles ---
There are many documents that would could collaborate on.
Here are some categories. We can cut and paste URL's of existing documentation here.
++Software guides: What software does what job, what are the pros and cons of these applications
++Perscriptive Idiot Guides for Encoding and Applications
++Video Handbooks, Video Making Documents, Overview guides to Video online / distribution
++Indepth Documentation for Geeks, building media servers, installing CMS's, transcoding, command line encoding etc.
--- Edited transcript of the chat ---
trying to address the duplication of documentation
keeping things up to date
communicating back with developers
too specific to be shared ... targetting of the documentation to users
and different types of audiences
translation and languages is an issue
difficult to manage as there are many platforms
compare with images for example (photoshop, gimp)
topic seems to be too general, a lot of people do encoding for different platforms, so hard to write documentation. inherent problem with writing documentation for video making, too general a topic as oppsed to writing for image maniplation where everyone has photoshop
2 approaches
one is per-package, one is "generic"
per-package may be 50 different help files
Also, the potential expected results are varied as well (not only JPG/GIF/PNG, but too many options formats codecs).
but we can't really define a "standard"
an overview is relatively easier to produce
and then enable drill-down to specifics
need people as committed to writing documentation as other people are committed to writing software
documentation should be part of the software release
documentation should be written by non-developers for users
video blog? step by step guide to uploading video etc, including video documentation
screencasting, allows yoou to record and narrate everything that you do on screen
really effective way of documentation, need to look up software for that
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Screencast
vnc remote desktop software
Screencasting is an effective way to do documentation. Program
Snap X Pro (Mac OS X)
http://freevlog.org/ confirmed
http://www.streamingmanuals.net
camtasia player
http://freevlog.org/tutorial/#
it is to record your screen on windoiws
vnc2swf for multiplatform screencasting
about the screen capturing, also there is http://www.unixuser.org/~euske/vnc2swf/
http://del.icio.us/avngoinabox/tutorials
http://audiovideo.ngoinabox.org
http://www.transmission.cc/wiki/Notes_from_the_Creating_a_common_reposit...
we need to analyse where the gaps are
indepth docs for geeks means the server guys who run the boxes but dont know anything about video
but we should focus on the idiots guides
http://video.indymedia.org/en/
http://www.videohelp.com (for beginner to advanced)
http://www.streamingsuitcase.com/
http://www.doom9.com (non-beginner)
http://docs.indymedia.org (good 'portal')
but there is still no good place to disemminate all the existing documentation
we shouldn't create a new thing
but creating a 'gateway' is just as hard
we could use the same format as floss
http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Main_Page
http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Video
http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Video#Internet_Video
something usable has been started there..
can make print on demand books from the mute technology
wikibooks not being looked after closely so could easily be taken over
people seem happy with this idea
let's do it.
- Login to post comments
Content is available under GNU Documentation License 1.2